โ† Back to Scanner
B

jpmorganchase.com

Posture Score: 80/100

Scanned May 10, 2026 at 4:47 PM UTC

Score History

100 50 0 May 8 May 10

Identity

62

Attack Surface

87

Reputation

92

Identity Findings

No MX records found
The domain has no MX records and cannot receive email.
๐Ÿ’ก Publish MX records pointing to your mail server(s).
critical
No DKIM records found
No DKIM records were found for any common selector. Email may not be authenticated.
๐Ÿ’ก Configure DKIM signing and publish the public key at <selector>._domainkey.jpmorganchase.com
high
NS delegation mismatch
The registrar-delegated nameservers do not match the zone NS records.
๐Ÿ’ก Update either the registrar NS delegation or the zone NS records to match.
high
No MTA-STS record found
Without MTA-STS, mail transport encryption cannot be enforced and is vulnerable to downgrade attacks.
๐Ÿ’ก Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and host a policy file at https://mta-sts.jpmorganchase.com/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
medium
No TLS-RPT record found
Without TLS-RPT, you will not receive reports about TLS negotiation failures.
๐Ÿ’ก Publish a _smtp._tls TXT record (e.g. "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:tls-reports@jpmorganchase.com").
low
ARC check skipped โ€” no MX records
Cannot assess ARC support without MX records.
low
No CAA iodef tag configured
No iodef tag is present in the CAA records. CA policy violation reports will not be sent.
๐Ÿ’ก Add an iodef CAA record. Example: 0 iodef "mailto:security@example.com"
low
SPF record is valid
The SPF record is properly configured with valid syntax and within lookup limits.
pass
SPF record length OK (208 bytes)
SPF record is within safe DNS packet size limits.
pass
DKIM cryptographic configuration is compliant
No RFC 8301 compliance issues detected in DKIM key configuration.
pass
All external report destinations authorized
External DMARC report destinations have valid authorization records per RFC 7489 ยง7.1.
pass
Subdomains protected (sp=reject)
DMARC subdomain policy enforces quarantine or reject on unauthenticated subdomain mail.
pass
BIMI record is valid
BIMI is properly configured with a valid logo and DMARC enforcement.
pass
VMC URL is accessible
The BIMI VMC authority URL is reachable and returns a valid response.
pass
Meets bulk sender authentication requirements
Domain has SPF, DKIM, and DMARC โ€” meeting Google/Yahoo 2024 bulk sender requirements for email authentication.
pass
IPv6 readiness is good
IPv6 records are present and properly configured.
pass
DNS responses are consistent across all nameservers
All authoritative nameservers return consistent answers with proper AA flags.
pass
DNS TTL values follow best practices
All critical DNS record TTLs are within recommended ranges.
pass
DKIM2 not detected
No DKIM key record with v=2 was found across common selectors. DKIM2 is an emerging standard and not yet widely deployed.
informational
DMARC alignment: adkim=r, aspf=r
DKIM alignment is relaxed, SPF alignment is relaxed.
informational
DMARC failure reporting: fo=1
Failure reports generated when any authentication mechanism fails.
informational
DMARCbis np tag absent
The DMARC record does not include the np (non-existent subdomain policy) tag. Consider adding np=reject to protect non-existent subdomains under DMARCbis.
informational
Deprecated DMARCbis tags found: pct
The DMARC record contains tags deprecated in DMARCbis: pct. Consider removing these for forward compatibility.
informational
DMARCbis psd tag absent
The DMARC record does not include the psd (public suffix domain) indicator. Consider adding psd=n to explicitly identify this as an organizational domain.
informational
DANE check skipped โ€” no MX records
Cannot check DANE/TLSA without MX records.
informational
Open relay check skipped โ€” no MX records
Cannot test for open relay without MX records.
informational
SMTP compliance check skipped โ€” no MX records
Cannot test SMTP compliance without MX records.
informational
Port exposure check skipped โ€” no MX records
Cannot scan ports without MX records.
informational
STARTTLS downgrade check skipped โ€” no MX records
Cannot test STARTTLS without MX records.
informational
RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe assessment
No DKIM signing detected. RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe requires DKIM-signed List-Unsubscribe headers.
informational
FCrDNS check skipped โ€” no MX records
Cannot perform FCrDNS without MX records.
informational
SOA record parameters
Serial: 656929939, Refresh: 10800s, Retry: 1800s, Expire: 1209600s, Min TTL: 3600s
informational
Authorized certificate authorities
CAA records restrict certificate issuance to: digicert.com, entrust.net
informational

Attack Surface Findings

DNS ANY query returns 32 record(s)
The DNS server responds to ANY queries with 32 record(s), creating significant DNS amplification risk.
๐Ÿ’ก Configure the DNS server to refuse or minimize ANY query responses per RFC 8482.
medium
Domain enumerability: medium
The domain has moderate enumerability. CT logs and DNS records reveal significant information about the domain structure.
๐Ÿ’ก Restrict zone transfers, use NSEC3 instead of NSEC, consider wildcard certificates to reduce CT log exposure, and implement rate limiting on DNS queries.
medium
DNSSEC is not enabled
No DNSKEY or DS records were found. DNS responses are not cryptographically authenticated.
๐Ÿ’ก Enable DNSSEC by generating DNSKEY records and publishing DS records at the registrar.
medium
No MX records โ€” A-record fallback active
The domain has no MX records but has an A record. Per RFC 5321, mail servers will attempt delivery to the A record IP. This domain may be silently accepting mail without SPF/DKIM/DMARC protection.
๐Ÿ’ก If this domain should not receive mail, publish a Null MX record (RFC 7505): "0 ." as the MX. If it should receive mail, add proper MX records.
low
Non-mail domain correctly publishes SPF -all
This domain has no MX and publishes "v=spf1 -all", preventing spoofing.
pass
No internal information leakage detected
No non-routable IP addresses or internal references were found in public DNS records.
pass
No email autodiscovery endpoints detected
No Microsoft Autodiscover, Mozilla Autoconfig, or email SRV records were found.
pass
5 subdomain(s) discovered for jpmorganchase.com
Subdomains were enumerated via Certificate Transparency logs, DNS wordlist brute-forcing, and DNS record analysis.
informational
0 certificate(s) found in CT logs
Certificate Transparency logs contain 0 certificate(s) for jpmorganchase.com and its subdomains. Each certificate reveals subdomain names.
informational

Reputation Findings

TLS certificate expires in 23 days
Certificate for jpmorganchase.com expires on 2026-06-02 (23 days).
๐Ÿ’ก Renew the TLS certificate soon โ€” it expires within 30 days.
high
Not listed on any DNS blacklists
Domain and MX IPs checked against 55 DNSBLs โ€” no listings found.
pass
HSTS enabled with preload on jpmorganchase.com
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=15768000 ; includeSubDomains ; preload
pass
security.txt present
Found security.txt at https://jpmorganchase.com/.well-known/security.txt.
pass
Certificate issued by DigiCert EV RSA CA G2
The certificate for jpmorganchase.com is issued by a third-party CA.
pass
Signature algorithm: rsa-sha256
The certificate for jpmorganchase.com uses an acceptable signature algorithm.
pass
RSA key: 2048 bits
The certificate for jpmorganchase.com uses an adequate RSA key of 2048 bits.
pass
SCTs present in certificate
The certificate for jpmorganchase.com contains Signed Certificate Timestamps.
pass
No weak ciphers detected
No known weak cipher suites detected on jpmorganchase.com.
pass
Domain valid for 490 days
Domain jpmorganchase.com expires on 2027-09-12.
pass
Domain transfer and delete locks enabled
Domain jpmorganchase.com has clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited locks.
pass
No disposable email provider MX records
MX records for jpmorganchase.com do not match known disposable email provider patterns.
pass
Domain is 9370 days old
Domain jpmorganchase.com was registered 2000-09-12.
pass
No wildcard MX records
No wildcard MX records detected for jpmorganchase.com.
pass
TLD has good reputation
The .com TLD is not on known abuse watchlists.
pass
DMARC reporting destinations look legitimate
DMARC rua/ruf addresses do not point to known URL shortener services.
pass
Google Safe Browsing DNS check โ€” no flag detected
DNS-based Safe Browsing lookup returned no results. Full verification requires the Google Safe Browsing API key.
informational
No abuse contacts resolved
Could not resolve abuse contact information for MX IPs via abusix.org.
informational
PhishTank โ€” API key required
PhishTank phishing database check requires an API key.
informational
Sender Score โ€” API key required
Sender Score reputation check requires an API key.
informational
Cisco Talos โ€” API key required
Cisco Talos IP reputation check requires an API key.
informational
Could not connect to webmail.jpmorganchase.com
HTTPS request to https://webmail.jpmorganchase.com failed or timed out.
informational
WHOIS registration data
Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc. | Created: 2000-09-12 | Expires: 2027-09-12 | Updated: 2025-08-11
informational
WHOIS privacy protection not detected
Domain jpmorganchase.com does not appear to have WHOIS privacy protection. Registrant details may be publicly visible.
informational
Bulletproof Hosting Detection โ€” API key required
Checking IPs against known bulletproof hosting providers requires a threat intelligence API key.
informational
Threat Intelligence Feeds โ€” API key required
Checking domain against threat intelligence feeds requires API keys (e.g., VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB).
informational
Typosquat detected: jporganchase.com (has MX!), jpmorgachase.com (has MX!), jpmorganchse.com (has MX!), jpmorganchae.com (has MX!), jpmorganchsae.com (has MX!)
17 registered lookalike domain(s) that could be used for phishing against your brand. Showing top 5 of 17. Domains with MX records can send and receive email, making them high-risk phishing vectors.
informational

Dependency Chains

DMARC Authentication Chain (SPF)
DMARC uses SPF to verify that emails come from authorized servers
SPF Record SPF record found and configured โ†’ DMARC Policy DMARC policy: reject
DMARC Authentication Chain (DKIM)
DMARC uses DKIM to verify that emails have not been tampered with
DKIM Signature DKIM signature missing โ†’ DMARC Policy DMARC policy: reject
โš ๏ธ DKIM signature is missing. DMARC relies on DKIM to verify email integrity and prevent tampering. Without DKIM, DMARC alignment will fail for cryptographic verification.
Enforced Encryption Chain
MTA-STS enforces TLS encryption to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks
TLS Support TLS not verified or unsupported โ†’ MTA-STS Policy MTA-STS not configured
โš ๏ธ TLS support could not be verified. MTA-STS requires TLS to enforce encrypted connections. Without TLS, MTA-STS cannot function.
Brand Identity Chain
BIMI displays your logo in email clients, but requires DMARC enforcement
DMARC Enforcement DMARC policy: reject โ†’ BIMI Record Brand logo configured
TLS Monitoring Chain
TLS-RPT provides reports about TLS connection failures
TLS Support TLS not verified or unsupported โ†’ TLS-RPT Reporting TLS-RPT not configured
โš ๏ธ TLS support could not be verified. TLS-RPT reports on TLS connection failures, but without TLS support, there's nothing to monitor. You need working TLS encryption before TLS-RPT can provide value.

Security Checks

MX Records
โœ—
SPF Record
โœ“
DKIM Record
โœ—
DMARC Policy
โœ“
BIMI Record
โœ“
CAA Records
โœ“
DNSSEC
โœ—
MTA-STS
โœ—
TLS-RPT
โœ—

Embed Badge

Display your domain's security grade on your website or README:

jpmorganchase.com Email Security Grade
<img src="https://scan.ractermx.com/badge/jpmorganchase.com.svg" alt="Email Security Grade">

Want to re-scan this domain for updated results?

Scan jpmorganchase.com Again