Identity
37
D
mooo.com
Posture Score: 66/100
Scanned May 30, 2026 at 8:31 AM UTC
Attack Surface
83
Reputation
77
Identity Findings
No SPF record found
The domain has no SPF record, allowing anyone to send email as this domain.
💡 Publish an SPF TXT record (e.g. "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all").
No DMARC record found
The domain has no DMARC record, providing no policy for handling unauthenticated email.
💡 Publish a DMARC TXT record at _dmarc.mooo.com (e.g. "v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc@mooo.com").
Invalid TLS certificate on mail.afraid.org
The TLS certificate presented by the mail server is expired or invalid.
💡 Renew or replace the TLS certificate on the mail server.
Does not meet bulk sender requirements
Google and Yahoo require all bulk senders to have SPF+DKIM, DMARC, and one-click unsubscribe. Issues: Neither SPF nor DKIM is configured (at least one required); No DMARC record published (required since Feb 2024); SPF not published (recommended alongside DKIM)
💡 Publish SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records. Implement RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe for marketing mail.
No DKIM records found
No DKIM records were found after probing 56 common selectors. The domain may use a custom selector not discoverable via external scan.
💡 Configure DKIM signing and publish the public key at <selector>._domainkey.mooo.com
No MTA-STS record found
Without MTA-STS, mail transport encryption cannot be enforced and is vulnerable to downgrade attacks.
💡 Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and host a policy file at https://mta-sts.mooo.com/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
STARTTLS without MTA-STS or DANE protection
STARTTLS alone is vulnerable to downgrade attacks. Neither MTA-STS nor DANE is configured to enforce encryption.
💡 Deploy MTA-STS and/or DANE to protect against STARTTLS stripping attacks.
No CAA records found
No CAA records are configured. Any certificate authority can issue certificates for this domain.
💡 Add CAA records to restrict certificate issuance. Example: 0 issue "letsencrypt.org"
No TLS-RPT record found
Without TLS-RPT, you will not receive reports about TLS negotiation failures.
💡 Publish a _smtp._tls TXT record (e.g. "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:tls-reports@mooo.com").
DKIM cryptographic configuration is compliant
No RFC 8301 compliance issues detected in DKIM key configuration.
ARC support likely available
MX server software appears to support ARC headers for authentication preservation.
SMTP security checks passed
No open relay, VRFY/EXPN, or banner disclosure issues detected.
SMTP RFC 5321 compliance checks passed
The mail server accepts postmaster@ and abuse@ and uses a valid FQDN in EHLO.
IPv6 readiness is good
IPv6 records are present and properly configured.
NS delegation is properly configured
All nameservers are responsive, consistent, and properly secured.
DNS responses are consistent across all nameservers
All authoritative nameservers return consistent answers with proper AA flags.
DNS TTL values follow best practices
All critical DNS record TTLs are within recommended ranges.
DKIM2 not detected
No DKIM key record with v=2 was found across common selectors. DKIM2 is an emerging standard and not yet widely deployed.
REQUIRETLS not advertised
The primary MX does not advertise REQUIRETLS (RFC 8689). This is an emerging standard — MTA-STS and DANE provide adequate TLS enforcement for most deployments.
No DANE/TLSA records found
DANE is not configured for any MX server. This is optional but provides strong certificate binding.
No BIMI record found
BIMI is not configured. Your brand logo will not display in supporting email clients.
Open mail ports on mail.afraid.org
Detected open mail-related ports: 25
RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe assessment
No DKIM signing detected. RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe requires DKIM-signed List-Unsubscribe headers.
MX IP network diversity
All MX IPs are in the same /16 network. Consider diversifying across networks for resilience.
SOA record parameters
Serial: 2605300010, Refresh: 86400s, Retry: 7200s, Expire: 2419200s, Min TTL: 3600s
Attack Surface Findings
Non-routable IPv4 in public DNS: staging.mooo.com → 127.0.0.2
The subdomain staging.mooo.com resolves to non-routable IP 127.0.0.2, leaking internal network information.
💡 Remove non-routable IPs from public DNS or implement split-horizon DNS.
Domain enumerability: medium
The domain has moderate enumerability. CT logs and DNS records reveal significant information about the domain structure.
💡 Restrict zone transfers, use NSEC3 instead of NSEC, consider wildcard certificates to reduce CT log exposure, and implement rate limiting on DNS queries.
DNSSEC is not enabled
No DNSKEY or DS records were found. DNS responses are not cryptographically authenticated.
💡 Enable DNSSEC by generating DNSKEY records and publishing DS records at the registrar.
DNS ANY query returns 15 record(s)
The DNS server responds to ANY queries with 15 record(s). The low record count limits amplification risk, but ANY responses still aid reconnaissance.
💡 Configure the DNS server to refuse or minimize ANY query responses per RFC 8482.
No subdomain takeover risks detected
All checked subdomains have valid, responsive targets.
All MX records resolve correctly
No dangling MX records detected — all MX hostnames resolve to valid IP addresses.
Explicit MX records present
The domain has explicit MX records — no implicit A-record fallback delivery.
No email autodiscovery endpoints detected
No Microsoft Autodiscover, Mozilla Autoconfig, or email SRV records were found.
6 subdomain(s) discovered for mooo.com
Subdomains were enumerated via Certificate Transparency logs, DNS wordlist brute-forcing, and DNS record analysis.
0 certificate(s) found in CT logs
Certificate Transparency logs contain 0 certificate(s) for mooo.com and its subdomains. Each certificate reveals subdomain names.
Reputation Findings
Could not retrieve TLS certificate
Failed to connect to mooo.com:443 or retrieve the peer certificate.
💡 Ensure the domain has a valid TLS certificate installed and port 443 is accessible.
MX records point to dynamic DNS service
Mail servers hosted on consumer-grade dynamic DNS services are commonly associated with abuse, botnets, and short-lived fraud infrastructure. Major mail providers often block or heavily scrutinize mail from these hosts.
💡 Host mail infrastructure on stable, business-class DNS with static hostnames and documented ownership.
Not listed on any DNS blacklists
Domain and MX IPs checked against 55 DNSBLs — no listings found.
No disposable email provider MX records
MX records for mooo.com do not match known disposable email provider patterns.
No wildcard MX records
No wildcard MX records detected for mooo.com.
TLD has good reputation
The .com TLD is not on known abuse watchlists.
Strong TLS configuration on primary MX
Primary MX (mail.afraid.org) uses TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 including Forward Secrecy.
SMTP banner matches infrastructure identity
The SMTP banner (mail.afraid.org) aligns with the MX hostname (mail.afraid.org).
Google Safe Browsing DNS check — no flag detected
DNS-based Safe Browsing lookup returned no results. Full verification requires the Google Safe Browsing API key.
Abuse contacts found for MX IPs
Abuse contact information retrieved via abusix.org DNS lookup.
PhishTank — API key required
PhishTank phishing database check requires an API key.
Sender Score — API key required
Sender Score reputation check requires an API key.
Cisco Talos — API key required
Cisco Talos IP reputation check requires an API key.
Could not connect to mooo.com
HTTPS request to https://mooo.com failed or timed out.
Could not connect to webmail.mooo.com
HTTPS request to https://webmail.mooo.com failed or timed out.
WHOIS lookup failed
Could not retrieve WHOIS data for mooo.com.
Could not determine domain age
WHOIS creation date could not be parsed for mooo.com.
Bulletproof Hosting Detection — API key required
Checking IPs against known bulletproof hosting providers requires a threat intelligence API key.
Threat Intelligence Feeds — API key required
Checking domain against threat intelligence feeds requires API keys (e.g., VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB).
Typosquat detected: moo.com (has MX!), omoo.com (has MX!), kooo.com (has MX!), mpoo.com (has MX!), mopo.com (has MX!)
25 registered lookalike domain(s) that could be used for phishing against your brand. Showing top 5 of 25. Domains with MX records can send and receive email, making them high-risk phishing vectors.
Dependency Chains
DMARC Authentication Chain (SPF)
DMARC uses SPF to verify that emails come from authorized servers
SPF Record
SPF record missing
→
DMARC Policy
DMARC policy missing
⚠️ SPF record is missing. DMARC relies on SPF to verify sender authorization. Without SPF, DMARC alignment will fail, reducing email deliverability and brand protection.
DMARC Authentication Chain (DKIM)
DMARC uses DKIM to verify that emails have not been tampered with
DKIM Signature
DKIM signature missing
→
DMARC Policy
DMARC policy missing
⚠️ DKIM signature is missing. DMARC relies on DKIM to verify email integrity and prevent tampering. Without DKIM, DMARC alignment will fail for cryptographic verification.
Mail Server Identity: mail.afraid.org
PTR record proves mail server legitimacy
MX: mail.afraid.org
Mail server at 150.238.42.14
→
PTR Record
Reverse DNS: mail.afraid.org
Mail Server Reputation: mail.afraid.org
RBL check ensures server is not blacklisted
MX: mail.afraid.org
Mail server at 150.238.42.14
→
RBL Status
Not blacklisted
Enforced Encryption Chain
MTA-STS enforces TLS encryption to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks
TLS Support
Mail servers support TLS encryption
→
MTA-STS Policy
MTA-STS not configured
⚠️ MTA-STS policy is missing. Even with TLS support, you lack the enforcement layer that prevents attackers from stripping encryption (downgrade attacks).
Brand Identity Chain
BIMI displays your logo in email clients, but requires DMARC enforcement
DMARC Enforcement
DMARC not enforced (p=none or missing)
→
BIMI Record
BIMI not configured
⚠️ DMARC is not enforced. BIMI requires a DMARC policy of "quarantine" or "reject" to prove you have strong email authentication. Without enforcement, email clients will not display your logo.
TLS Monitoring Chain
TLS-RPT provides reports about TLS connection failures
TLS Support
Mail servers support TLS encryption
→
TLS-RPT Reporting
TLS-RPT not configured
⚠️ TLS-RPT is not configured. Without TLS reporting, you have no visibility into TLS connection failures that may be impacting email delivery.
Security Checks
MX Records
✓
SPF Record
✗
DKIM Record
✗
DMARC Policy
✗
BIMI Record
✗
CAA Records
✗
DNSSEC
✗
MTA-STS
✗
TLS-RPT
✗
Embed Badge
Display your domain's security grade on your website or README:
<img src="https://scan.ractermx.com/badge/mooo.com.svg" alt="Email Security Grade">
Want to re-scan this domain for updated results?
Scan mooo.com Again