Identity
54
B
powerapps.com
Posture Score: 81/100
Scanned May 30, 2026 at 3:17 AM UTC
Attack Surface
91
Reputation
98
Identity Findings
No MX records found
The domain has no MX records and cannot receive email.
💡 Publish MX records pointing to your mail server(s).
Weak DKIM RSA key (~1296 bits) for selector 's2'
RSA keys shorter than 2048 bits are considered weak. Current key is approximately 1296 bits.
💡 Generate a new 2048-bit (or larger) RSA key pair and update the DKIM record.
Subdomains have no DMARC enforcement
No sp= tag set and p=none. Subdomains inherit the monitoring-only policy, leaving them open to spoofing.
💡 Add sp=reject (or sp=quarantine) to your DMARC record to protect subdomains.
DMARC policy is monitoring-only (p=none)
The p=none policy only monitors; it does not instruct receivers to quarantine or reject unauthenticated mail.
💡 Upgrade to p=quarantine or p=reject after reviewing aggregate reports.
No DMARC aggregate report URI (rua=)
Without rua=, you will not receive aggregate reports about authentication results.
💡 Add rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@powerapps.com to your DMARC record.
No MTA-STS record found
Without MTA-STS, mail transport encryption cannot be enforced and is vulnerable to downgrade attacks.
💡 Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and host a policy file at https://mta-sts.powerapps.com/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
No TLS-RPT record found
Without TLS-RPT, you will not receive reports about TLS negotiation failures.
💡 Publish a _smtp._tls TXT record (e.g. "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:tls-reports@powerapps.com").
ARC check skipped — no MX records
Cannot assess ARC support without MX records.
No CAA iodef tag configured
No iodef tag is present in the CAA records. CA policy violation reports will not be sent.
💡 Add an iodef CAA record. Example: 0 iodef "mailto:security@example.com"
SPF record is valid
The SPF record is properly configured with valid syntax and within lookup limits.
SPF record length OK (67 bytes)
SPF record is within safe DNS packet size limits.
DKIM cryptographic configuration is compliant
No RFC 8301 compliance issues detected in DKIM key configuration.
DKIM key strength indicates modern key management
All DKIM keys use RSA-2048+ or Ed25519, consistent with current best practices.
No external DMARC report destinations
All DMARC report URIs point to the same domain — no external authorization needed.
No deprecated DMARCbis tags present
The DMARC record does not use any tags deprecated in DMARCbis (pct, rf, ri).
Meets bulk sender authentication requirements
Domain has SPF, DKIM, and DMARC — meeting Google/Yahoo 2024 bulk sender requirements for email authentication.
IPv6 readiness is good
IPv6 records are present and properly configured.
NS delegation is properly configured
All nameservers are responsive, consistent, and properly secured.
DNS responses are consistent across all nameservers
All authoritative nameservers return consistent answers with proper AA flags.
DNS TTL values follow best practices
All critical DNS record TTLs are within recommended ranges.
DKIM2 not detected
No DKIM key record with v=2 was found across common selectors. DKIM2 is an emerging standard and not yet widely deployed.
DMARC alignment: adkim=r, aspf=r
DKIM alignment is relaxed, SPF alignment is relaxed.
DMARCbis np tag absent
The DMARC record does not include the np (non-existent subdomain policy) tag. Consider adding np=reject to protect non-existent subdomains under DMARCbis.
DMARCbis psd tag absent
The DMARC record does not include the psd (public suffix domain) indicator. Consider adding psd=n to explicitly identify this as an organizational domain.
DANE check skipped — no MX records
Cannot check DANE/TLSA without MX records.
No BIMI record found
BIMI is not configured. Your brand logo will not display in supporting email clients.
Open relay check skipped — no MX records
Cannot test for open relay without MX records.
SMTP compliance check skipped — no MX records
Cannot test SMTP compliance without MX records.
Port exposure check skipped — no MX records
Cannot scan ports without MX records.
STARTTLS downgrade check skipped — no MX records
Cannot test STARTTLS without MX records.
RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe assessment
DKIM signing is configured. RFC 8058 compliance depends on List-Unsubscribe and List-Unsubscribe-Post headers being included in outbound messages and DKIM signatures.
FCrDNS check skipped — no MX records
Cannot perform FCrDNS without MX records.
SOA record parameters
Serial: 1, Refresh: 3600s, Retry: 300s, Expire: 2419200s, Min TTL: 300s
Attack Surface Findings
Domain enumerability: medium
The domain has moderate enumerability. CT logs and DNS records reveal significant information about the domain structure.
💡 Restrict zone transfers, use NSEC3 instead of NSEC, consider wildcard certificates to reduce CT log exposure, and implement rate limiting on DNS queries.
DNSSEC is not enabled
No DNSKEY or DS records were found. DNS responses are not cryptographically authenticated.
💡 Enable DNSSEC by generating DNSKEY records and publishing DS records at the registrar.
No MX records — A-record fallback active
The domain has no MX records but has an A record. Per RFC 5321, mail servers will attempt delivery to the A record IP. This domain may be silently accepting mail without SPF/DKIM/DMARC protection.
💡 If this domain should not receive mail, publish a Null MX record (RFC 7505): "0 ." as the MX. If it should receive mail, add proper MX records.
Non-mail domain correctly publishes SPF -all
This domain has no MX and publishes "v=spf1 -all", preventing spoofing.
No internal information leakage detected
No non-routable IP addresses or internal references were found in public DNS records.
No excessive DNS information exposure detected
No HINFO, LOC, RP records, version disclosures, or zone walking vulnerabilities were found.
No email autodiscovery endpoints detected
No Microsoft Autodiscover, Mozilla Autoconfig, or email SRV records were found.
6 subdomain(s) discovered for powerapps.com
Subdomains were enumerated via Certificate Transparency logs, DNS wordlist brute-forcing, and DNS record analysis.
0 certificate(s) found in CT logs
Certificate Transparency logs contain 0 certificate(s) for powerapps.com and its subdomains. Each certificate reveals subdomain names.
Reputation Findings
HSTS enabled but missing preload directive on powerapps.com
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
💡 Add the "preload" directive to the HSTS header and submit the domain to hstspreload.org.
Missing security.txt
No security.txt found at https://powerapps.com/.well-known/security.txt.
💡 Create a /.well-known/security.txt file per RFC 9116 with Contact, Expires, and optionally Encryption and Policy fields.
Not listed on any DNS blacklists
Domain and MX IPs checked against 55 DNSBLs — no listings found.
TLS certificate valid for 100 days
Certificate for powerapps.com expires on 2026-09-07.
Certificate issued by Microsoft TLS G2 RSA CA OCSP 02
The certificate for powerapps.com is issued by a third-party CA.
Signature algorithm: rsa-sha384
The certificate for powerapps.com uses an acceptable signature algorithm.
RSA key: 2048 bits
The certificate for powerapps.com uses an adequate RSA key of 2048 bits.
SCTs present in certificate
The certificate for powerapps.com contains Signed Certificate Timestamps.
No weak ciphers detected
No known weak cipher suites detected on powerapps.com.
Domain valid for 283 days
Domain powerapps.com expires on 2027-03-09.
Domain transfer and delete locks enabled
Domain powerapps.com has clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited locks.
No disposable email provider MX records
MX records for powerapps.com do not match known disposable email provider patterns.
Domain is 10307 days old
Domain powerapps.com was registered 1998-03-10.
No wildcard MX records
No wildcard MX records detected for powerapps.com.
TLD has good reputation
The .com TLD is not on known abuse watchlists.
DMARC reporting destinations look legitimate
DMARC rua/ruf addresses do not point to known URL shortener services.
Google Safe Browsing DNS check — no flag detected
DNS-based Safe Browsing lookup returned no results. Full verification requires the Google Safe Browsing API key.
No abuse contacts resolved
Could not resolve abuse contact information for MX IPs via abusix.org.
PhishTank — API key required
PhishTank phishing database check requires an API key.
Sender Score — API key required
Sender Score reputation check requires an API key.
Cisco Talos — API key required
Cisco Talos IP reputation check requires an API key.
Could not connect to webmail.powerapps.com
HTTPS request to https://webmail.powerapps.com failed or timed out.
WHOIS registration data
Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc. | Created: 1998-03-10 | Expires: 2027-03-09 | Updated: 2026-02-05
WHOIS privacy protection not detected
Domain powerapps.com does not appear to have WHOIS privacy protection. Registrant details may be publicly visible.
Bulletproof Hosting Detection — API key required
Checking IPs against known bulletproof hosting providers requires a threat intelligence API key.
Threat Intelligence Feeds — API key required
Checking domain against threat intelligence feeds requires API keys (e.g., VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB).
Typosquat detected: pwoerapps.com (has MX!), poserapps.com (has MX!), owerapps.com, poerapps.com, poweapps.com
8 registered lookalike domain(s) that could be used for phishing against your brand. Showing top 5 of 8. Domains with MX records can send and receive email, making them high-risk phishing vectors.
Dependency Chains
DMARC Authentication Chain (SPF)
DMARC uses SPF to verify that emails come from authorized servers
SPF Record
SPF record found and configured
→
DMARC Policy
DMARC policy: none
DMARC Authentication Chain (DKIM)
DMARC uses DKIM to verify that emails have not been tampered with
DKIM Signature
DKIM signature missing
→
DMARC Policy
DMARC policy: none
⚠️ DKIM signature is missing. DMARC relies on DKIM to verify email integrity and prevent tampering. Without DKIM, DMARC alignment will fail for cryptographic verification.
Enforced Encryption Chain
MTA-STS enforces TLS encryption to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks
TLS Support
TLS not verified or unsupported
→
MTA-STS Policy
MTA-STS not configured
⚠️ TLS support could not be verified. MTA-STS requires TLS to enforce encrypted connections. Without TLS, MTA-STS cannot function.
Brand Identity Chain
BIMI displays your logo in email clients, but requires DMARC enforcement
DMARC Enforcement
DMARC not enforced (p=none or missing)
→
BIMI Record
BIMI not configured
⚠️ DMARC is not enforced. BIMI requires a DMARC policy of "quarantine" or "reject" to prove you have strong email authentication. Without enforcement, email clients will not display your logo.
TLS Monitoring Chain
TLS-RPT provides reports about TLS connection failures
TLS Support
TLS not verified or unsupported
→
TLS-RPT Reporting
TLS-RPT not configured
⚠️ TLS support could not be verified. TLS-RPT reports on TLS connection failures, but without TLS support, there's nothing to monitor. You need working TLS encryption before TLS-RPT can provide value.
Security Checks
MX Records
✗
SPF Record
✓
DKIM Record
✗
DMARC Policy
✓
BIMI Record
✗
CAA Records
✓
DNSSEC
✗
MTA-STS
✗
TLS-RPT
✗
Embed Badge
Display your domain's security grade on your website or README:
<img src="https://scan.ractermx.com/badge/powerapps.com.svg" alt="Email Security Grade">
Want to re-scan this domain for updated results?
Scan powerapps.com Again