Identity
30
C
react.dev
Posture Score: 72/100
Scanned May 10, 2026 at 5:13 AM UTC
Score History
Attack Surface
87
Reputation
99
Identity Findings
No SPF record found
The domain has no SPF record, allowing anyone to send email as this domain.
💡 Publish an SPF TXT record (e.g. "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all").
No DMARC record found
The domain has no DMARC record, providing no policy for handling unauthenticated email.
💡 Publish a DMARC TXT record at _dmarc.react.dev (e.g. "v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc@react.dev").
No MX records found
The domain has no MX records and cannot receive email.
💡 Publish MX records pointing to your mail server(s).
No DKIM records found
No DKIM records were found for any common selector. Email may not be authenticated.
💡 Configure DKIM signing and publish the public key at <selector>._domainkey.react.dev
Does not meet bulk sender requirements
Google and Yahoo require all bulk senders to have SPF+DKIM, DMARC, and one-click unsubscribe. Issues: Neither SPF nor DKIM is configured (at least one required); No DMARC record published (required since Feb 2024); SPF not published (recommended alongside DKIM)
💡 Publish SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records. Implement RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe for marketing mail.
No MTA-STS record found
Without MTA-STS, mail transport encryption cannot be enforced and is vulnerable to downgrade attacks.
💡 Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and host a policy file at https://mta-sts.react.dev/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
No TLS-RPT record found
Without TLS-RPT, you will not receive reports about TLS negotiation failures.
💡 Publish a _smtp._tls TXT record (e.g. "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:tls-reports@react.dev").
ARC check skipped — no MX records
Cannot assess ARC support without MX records.
No CAA iodef tag configured
No iodef tag is present in the CAA records. CA policy violation reports will not be sent.
💡 Add an iodef CAA record. Example: 0 iodef "mailto:security@example.com"
Very low TTL on TXT record: 249s
The TXT record has a TTL of 249s or less (below 300s).
💡 Increase the TTL to at least 300 seconds unless frequent changes are expected.
NS TTL mismatch between parent and authoritative zone
The NS record TTL in the parent zone (~7149s) differs significantly from the authoritative zone (~86400s).
💡 Align NS record TTLs between the parent zone delegation and the authoritative zone.
DKIM cryptographic configuration is compliant
No RFC 8301 compliance issues detected in DKIM key configuration.
IPv6 readiness is good
IPv6 records are present and properly configured.
NS delegation is properly configured
All nameservers are responsive, consistent, and properly secured.
DNS responses are consistent across all nameservers
All authoritative nameservers return consistent answers with proper AA flags.
DKIM2 not detected
No DKIM key record with v=2 was found across common selectors. DKIM2 is an emerging standard and not yet widely deployed.
DANE check skipped — no MX records
Cannot check DANE/TLSA without MX records.
No BIMI record found
BIMI is not configured. Your brand logo will not display in supporting email clients.
Open relay check skipped — no MX records
Cannot test for open relay without MX records.
SMTP compliance check skipped — no MX records
Cannot test SMTP compliance without MX records.
Port exposure check skipped — no MX records
Cannot scan ports without MX records.
STARTTLS downgrade check skipped — no MX records
Cannot test STARTTLS without MX records.
RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe assessment
No DKIM signing detected. RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe requires DKIM-signed List-Unsubscribe headers.
FCrDNS check skipped — no MX records
Cannot perform FCrDNS without MX records.
SOA record parameters
Serial: 2402371057, Refresh: 10000s, Retry: 2400s, Expire: 604800s, Min TTL: 1800s
Authorized certificate authorities
CAA records restrict certificate issuance to: pki.goog, globalsign.com, sectigo.com, letsencrypt.org
Attack Surface Findings
Non-mail domain has no SPF record
This domain has no MX records (does not receive mail) but also has no SPF record. Without "v=spf1 -all", attackers can spoof this domain in phishing emails.
💡 Publish "v=spf1 -all" to explicitly declare this domain sends no mail.
Domain enumerability: medium
The domain has moderate enumerability. CT logs and DNS records reveal significant information about the domain structure.
💡 Restrict zone transfers, use NSEC3 instead of NSEC, consider wildcard certificates to reduce CT log exposure, and implement rate limiting on DNS queries.
DNSSEC is not enabled
No DNSKEY or DS records were found. DNS responses are not cryptographically authenticated.
💡 Enable DNSSEC by generating DNSKEY records and publishing DS records at the registrar.
No MX records — A-record fallback active
The domain has no MX records but has an A record. Per RFC 5321, mail servers will attempt delivery to the A record IP. This domain may be silently accepting mail without SPF/DKIM/DMARC protection.
💡 If this domain should not receive mail, publish a Null MX record (RFC 7505): "0 ." as the MX. If it should receive mail, add proper MX records.
No internal information leakage detected
No non-routable IP addresses or internal references were found in public DNS records.
No excessive DNS information exposure detected
No HINFO, LOC, RP records, version disclosures, or zone walking vulnerabilities were found.
No email autodiscovery endpoints detected
No Microsoft Autodiscover, Mozilla Autoconfig, or email SRV records were found.
1 subdomain(s) discovered for react.dev
Subdomains were enumerated via Certificate Transparency logs, DNS wordlist brute-forcing, and DNS record analysis.
0 certificate(s) found in CT logs
Certificate Transparency logs contain 0 certificate(s) for react.dev and its subdomains. Each certificate reveals subdomain names.
Reputation Findings
HSTS enabled but missing preload directive on react.dev
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000
💡 Add the "preload" directive to the HSTS header and submit the domain to hstspreload.org.
Not listed on any DNS blacklists
Domain and MX IPs checked against 55 DNSBLs — no listings found.
security.txt present
Found security.txt at https://react.dev/.well-known/security.txt.
TLS certificate valid for 64 days
Certificate for react.dev expires on 2026-07-14.
Certificate issued by R13
The certificate for react.dev is issued by a third-party CA.
Signature algorithm: rsa-sha256
The certificate for react.dev uses an acceptable signature algorithm.
RSA key: 2048 bits
The certificate for react.dev uses an adequate RSA key of 2048 bits.
SCTs present in certificate
The certificate for react.dev contains Signed Certificate Timestamps.
No weak ciphers detected
No known weak cipher suites detected on react.dev.
No disposable email provider MX records
MX records for react.dev do not match known disposable email provider patterns.
No wildcard MX records
No wildcard MX records detected for react.dev.
TLD has good reputation
The .dev TLD is not on known abuse watchlists.
Google Safe Browsing DNS check — no flag detected
DNS-based Safe Browsing lookup returned no results. Full verification requires the Google Safe Browsing API key.
No abuse contacts resolved
Could not resolve abuse contact information for MX IPs via abusix.org.
PhishTank — API key required
PhishTank phishing database check requires an API key.
Sender Score — API key required
Sender Score reputation check requires an API key.
Cisco Talos — API key required
Cisco Talos IP reputation check requires an API key.
Could not connect to webmail.react.dev
HTTPS request to https://webmail.react.dev failed or timed out.
WHOIS lookup failed
Could not retrieve WHOIS data for react.dev.
Could not determine domain age
WHOIS creation date could not be parsed for react.dev.
Bulletproof Hosting Detection — API key required
Checking IPs against known bulletproof hosting providers requires a threat intelligence API key.
Threat Intelligence Feeds — API key required
Checking domain against threat intelligence feeds requires API keys (e.g., VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB).
Typosquat detected: ract.dev (has MX!), rect.dev, raect.dev, recat.dev, reaxt.dev
5 registered lookalike domain(s) that could be used for phishing against your brand. Domains with MX records can send and receive email, making them high-risk phishing vectors.
Dependency Chains
DMARC Authentication Chain (SPF)
DMARC uses SPF to verify that emails come from authorized servers
SPF Record
SPF record missing
→
DMARC Policy
DMARC policy missing
⚠️ SPF record is missing. DMARC relies on SPF to verify sender authorization. Without SPF, DMARC alignment will fail, reducing email deliverability and brand protection.
DMARC Authentication Chain (DKIM)
DMARC uses DKIM to verify that emails have not been tampered with
DKIM Signature
DKIM signature missing
→
DMARC Policy
DMARC policy missing
⚠️ DKIM signature is missing. DMARC relies on DKIM to verify email integrity and prevent tampering. Without DKIM, DMARC alignment will fail for cryptographic verification.
Enforced Encryption Chain
MTA-STS enforces TLS encryption to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks
TLS Support
TLS not verified or unsupported
→
MTA-STS Policy
MTA-STS not configured
⚠️ TLS support could not be verified. MTA-STS requires TLS to enforce encrypted connections. Without TLS, MTA-STS cannot function.
Brand Identity Chain
BIMI displays your logo in email clients, but requires DMARC enforcement
DMARC Enforcement
DMARC not enforced (p=none or missing)
→
BIMI Record
BIMI not configured
⚠️ DMARC is not enforced. BIMI requires a DMARC policy of "quarantine" or "reject" to prove you have strong email authentication. Without enforcement, email clients will not display your logo.
TLS Monitoring Chain
TLS-RPT provides reports about TLS connection failures
TLS Support
TLS not verified or unsupported
→
TLS-RPT Reporting
TLS-RPT not configured
⚠️ TLS support could not be verified. TLS-RPT reports on TLS connection failures, but without TLS support, there's nothing to monitor. You need working TLS encryption before TLS-RPT can provide value.
Security Checks
MX Records
✗
SPF Record
✗
DKIM Record
✗
DMARC Policy
✗
BIMI Record
✗
CAA Records
✗
DNSSEC
✗
MTA-STS
✗
TLS-RPT
✗
Embed Badge
Display your domain's security grade on your website or README:
<img src="https://scan.ractermx.com/badge/react.dev.svg" alt="Email Security Grade">
Want to re-scan this domain for updated results?
Scan react.dev Again