โ† Back to Scanner
B

vanta.com

Posture Score: 82/100

Scanned May 9, 2026 at 3:38 AM UTC

Score History

100 50 0 Mar 26 May 9

Identity

74

Attack Surface

88

Reputation

84

Identity Findings

Weak DKIM RSA key (~1296 bits) for selector 's2'
RSA keys shorter than 2048 bits are considered weak. Current key is approximately 1296 bits.
๐Ÿ’ก Generate a new 2048-bit (or larger) RSA key pair and update the DKIM record.
high
No MTA-STS record found
Without MTA-STS, mail transport encryption cannot be enforced and is vulnerable to downgrade attacks.
๐Ÿ’ก Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and host a policy file at https://mta-sts.vanta.com/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
medium
STARTTLS without MTA-STS or DANE protection
STARTTLS alone is vulnerable to downgrade attacks. Neither MTA-STS nor DANE is configured to enforce encryption.
๐Ÿ’ก Deploy MTA-STS and/or DANE to protect against STARTTLS stripping attacks.
medium
No CAA records found
No CAA records are configured. Any certificate authority can issue certificates for this domain.
๐Ÿ’ก Add CAA records to restrict certificate issuance. Example: 0 issue "letsencrypt.org"
medium
No TLS-RPT record found
Without TLS-RPT, you will not receive reports about TLS negotiation failures.
๐Ÿ’ก Publish a _smtp._tls TXT record (e.g. "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:tls-reports@vanta.com").
low
Slow DNS response from ns-394.awsdns-49.com: 2075.4ms
The nameserver ns-394.awsdns-49.com responded in 2075.4ms, exceeding the 500ms threshold.
๐Ÿ’ก Investigate network latency or performance issues on ns-394.awsdns-49.com.
low
Very low TTL on TXT records: 268s
34 TXT records have a TTL of 268s or less (below 300s).
๐Ÿ’ก Increase the TTL to at least 300 seconds unless frequent changes are expected.
low
Very low TTL on SPF record: 268s
The SPF record has a TTL of 268s or less (below 300s).
๐Ÿ’ก Increase the TTL to at least 300 seconds unless frequent changes are expected.
low
Very low TTL on DMARC record: 268s
The DMARC record has a TTL of 268s or less (below 300s).
๐Ÿ’ก Increase the TTL to at least 300 seconds unless frequent changes are expected.
low
NS TTL mismatch between parent and authoritative zone
The NS record TTL in the parent zone (~7168s) differs significantly from the authoritative zone (~172800s).
๐Ÿ’ก Align NS record TTLs between the parent zone delegation and the authoritative zone.
low
SPF record is valid
The SPF record is properly configured with valid syntax and within lookup limits.
pass
DKIM cryptographic configuration is compliant
No RFC 8301 compliance issues detected in DKIM key configuration.
pass
All external report destinations authorized
External DMARC report destinations have valid authorization records per RFC 7489 ยง7.1.
pass
Subdomains protected (sp=reject)
DMARC subdomain policy enforces quarantine or reject on unauthenticated subdomain mail.
pass
No deprecated DMARCbis tags present
The DMARC record does not use any tags deprecated in DMARCbis (pct, rf, ri).
pass
5 MX records with 5 unique IPs
Multiple MX records provide mail delivery redundancy.
pass
BIMI record is valid
BIMI is properly configured with a valid logo and DMARC enforcement.
pass
ARC support likely available
MX server software appears to support ARC headers for authentication preservation.
pass
Meets bulk sender authentication requirements
Domain has SPF, DKIM, and DMARC โ€” meeting Google/Yahoo 2024 bulk sender requirements for email authentication.
pass
SMTP security checks passed
No open relay, VRFY/EXPN, or banner disclosure issues detected.
pass
SMTP RFC 5321 compliance checks passed
The mail server accepts postmaster@ and abuse@ and uses a valid FQDN in EHLO.
pass
IPv6 readiness is good
IPv6 records are present and properly configured.
pass
NS delegation is properly configured
All nameservers are responsive, consistent, and properly secured.
pass
DKIM2 not detected
No DKIM key record with v=2 was found across common selectors. DKIM2 is an emerging standard and not yet widely deployed.
informational
DMARC alignment: adkim=r, aspf=r
DKIM alignment is relaxed, SPF alignment is relaxed.
informational
DMARC failure reporting: fo=1
Failure reports generated when any authentication mechanism fails.
informational
DMARCbis np tag absent
The DMARC record does not include the np (non-existent subdomain policy) tag. Consider adding np=reject to protect non-existent subdomains under DMARCbis.
informational
DMARCbis psd tag absent
The DMARC record does not include the psd (public suffix domain) indicator. Consider adding psd=n to explicitly identify this as an organizational domain.
informational
Shared/free email hosting detected: aspmx.l.google.com
The MX record points to a known shared or free email hosting provider.
informational
Shared/free email hosting detected: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
The MX record points to a known shared or free email hosting provider.
informational
Shared/free email hosting detected: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
The MX record points to a known shared or free email hosting provider.
informational
Shared/free email hosting detected: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
The MX record points to a known shared or free email hosting provider.
informational
Shared/free email hosting detected: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
The MX record points to a known shared or free email hosting provider.
informational
No DANE/TLSA records found
DANE is not configured for any MX server. This is optional but provides strong certificate binding.
informational
No VMC authority URL in BIMI record
The BIMI record does not specify a VMC (a= tag). Gmail and Apple Mail require a VMC to display brand logos.
informational
Open mail ports on aspmx.l.google.com
Detected open mail-related ports: 25
informational
RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe assessment
DKIM signing is configured. RFC 8058 compliance depends on List-Unsubscribe and List-Unsubscribe-Post headers being included in outbound messages and DKIM signatures.
informational
MX IP network diversity
MX IPs span 5 different /16 networks, providing good diversity.
informational
SOA record parameters
Serial: 1, Refresh: 7200s, Retry: 900s, Expire: 1209600s, Min TTL: 86400s
informational

Attack Surface Findings

DNS ANY query returns 46 record(s)
The DNS server responds to ANY queries with 46 record(s), creating significant DNS amplification risk.
๐Ÿ’ก Configure the DNS server to refuse or minimize ANY query responses per RFC 8482.
medium
Domain enumerability: medium
The domain has moderate enumerability. CT logs and DNS records reveal significant information about the domain structure.
๐Ÿ’ก Restrict zone transfers, use NSEC3 instead of NSEC, consider wildcard certificates to reduce CT log exposure, and implement rate limiting on DNS queries.
medium
DNSSEC is not enabled
No DNSKEY or DS records were found. DNS responses are not cryptographically authenticated.
๐Ÿ’ก Enable DNSSEC by generating DNSKEY records and publishing DS records at the registrar.
medium
All MX records resolve correctly
No dangling MX records detected โ€” all MX hostnames resolve to valid IP addresses.
pass
Explicit MX records present
The domain has explicit MX records โ€” no implicit A-record fallback delivery.
pass
No internal information leakage detected
No non-routable IP addresses or internal references were found in public DNS records.
pass
No email autodiscovery endpoints detected
No Microsoft Autodiscover, Mozilla Autoconfig, or email SRV records were found.
pass
6 subdomain(s) discovered for vanta.com
Subdomains were enumerated via Certificate Transparency logs, DNS wordlist brute-forcing, and DNS record analysis.
informational
0 certificate(s) found in CT logs
Certificate Transparency logs contain 0 certificate(s) for vanta.com and its subdomains. Each certificate reveals subdomain names.
informational

Reputation Findings

SMTP banner mismatch: mx.google.com
The SMTP banner identifies as 'mx.google.com' but the MX hostname is 'aspmx.l.google.com' and PTR resolves to 'di-in-f26.1e100.net'. Microsoft and other receivers flag this mismatch as suspicious infrastructure.
๐Ÿ’ก Configure the SMTP server banner to match the MX hostname or PTR record (aspmx.l.google.com).
high
Typosquat detected: anta.com (has MX!), vata.com (has MX!), vana.com (has MX!), vant.com (has MX!), avnta.com (has MX!)
26 registered lookalike domain(s) that could be used for phishing against your brand. Showing top 5 of 26. Domains with MX records can send and receive email, making them high-risk phishing vectors.
๐Ÿ’ก Consider registering common typosquats defensively, or monitor them for abuse. Domains with MX records are highest risk as they can send/receive phishing email.
high
HSTS enabled with preload on vanta.com
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
pass
security.txt present
Found security.txt at https://vanta.com/.well-known/security.txt.
pass
TLS certificate valid for 40 days
Certificate for vanta.com expires on 2026-06-18.
pass
Certificate issued by WE1
The certificate for vanta.com is issued by a third-party CA.
pass
Signature algorithm: ecdsa-with-sha256
The certificate for vanta.com uses an acceptable signature algorithm.
pass
ECC key: 256 bits
The certificate for vanta.com uses an adequate ECC key of 256 bits.
pass
SCTs present in certificate
The certificate for vanta.com contains Signed Certificate Timestamps.
pass
No weak ciphers detected
No known weak cipher suites detected on vanta.com.
pass
Domain valid for 488 days
Domain vanta.com expires on 2027-09-09.
pass
Domain transfer and delete locks enabled
Domain vanta.com has clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited locks.
pass
TLD has good reputation
The .com TLD is not on known abuse watchlists.
pass
DMARC reporting destinations look legitimate
DMARC rua/ruf addresses do not point to known URL shortener services.
pass
MX records point to stable infrastructure
No MX records point to known dynamic DNS service domains.
pass
Strong TLS configuration on primary MX
Primary MX (aspmx.l.google.com) uses TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 including Forward Secrecy.
pass
Google Safe Browsing DNS check โ€” no flag detected
DNS-based Safe Browsing lookup returned no results. Full verification requires the Google Safe Browsing API key.
informational
Abuse contact lookup failed
Could not query abuse contact information.
informational
PhishTank โ€” API key required
PhishTank phishing database check requires an API key.
informational
Sender Score โ€” API key required
Sender Score reputation check requires an API key.
informational
Cisco Talos โ€” API key required
Cisco Talos IP reputation check requires an API key.
informational
Could not connect to webmail.vanta.com
HTTPS request to https://webmail.vanta.com failed or timed out.
informational
WHOIS registration data
Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc. | Created: 2002-09-09 | Expires: 2027-09-09 | Updated: 2025-08-09
informational
WHOIS privacy protection not detected
Domain vanta.com does not appear to have WHOIS privacy protection. Registrant details may be publicly visible.
informational

Dependency Chains

DMARC Authentication Chain (SPF)
DMARC uses SPF to verify that emails come from authorized servers
SPF Record SPF record found and configured โ†’ DMARC Policy DMARC policy: reject
DMARC Authentication Chain (DKIM)
DMARC uses DKIM to verify that emails have not been tampered with
DKIM Signature DKIM signature missing โ†’ DMARC Policy DMARC policy: reject
โš ๏ธ DKIM signature is missing. DMARC relies on DKIM to verify email integrity and prevent tampering. Without DKIM, DMARC alignment will fail for cryptographic verification.
Mail Server Identity: aspmx.l.google.com
PTR record proves mail server legitimacy
MX: aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 209.85.203.26 โ†’ PTR Record Reverse DNS: dh-in-f26.1e100.net
Mail Server Identity: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
PTR record proves mail server legitimacy
MX: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 192.178.213.26 โ†’ PTR Record Reverse DNS: yugrqzs-in-f26.1e100.net
Mail Server Identity: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
PTR record proves mail server legitimacy
MX: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 142.251.127.27 โ†’ PTR Record Reverse DNS: lcfrai-in-f27.1e100.net
Mail Server Identity: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
PTR record proves mail server legitimacy
MX: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 173.194.76.27 โ†’ PTR Record Reverse DNS: ws-in-f27.1e100.net
Mail Server Identity: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
PTR record proves mail server legitimacy
MX: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 142.250.102.26 โ†’ PTR Record Reverse DNS: rb-in-f26.1e100.net
Mail Server Reputation: aspmx.l.google.com
RBL check ensures server is not blacklisted
MX: aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 209.85.203.26 โ†’ RBL Status Not blacklisted
Mail Server Reputation: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
RBL check ensures server is not blacklisted
MX: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 192.178.213.26 โ†’ RBL Status Not blacklisted
Mail Server Reputation: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
RBL check ensures server is not blacklisted
MX: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 142.251.127.27 โ†’ RBL Status Not blacklisted
Mail Server Reputation: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
RBL check ensures server is not blacklisted
MX: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 173.194.76.27 โ†’ RBL Status Not blacklisted
Mail Server Reputation: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
RBL check ensures server is not blacklisted
MX: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com Mail server at 142.250.102.26 โ†’ RBL Status Not blacklisted
Enforced Encryption Chain
MTA-STS enforces TLS encryption to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks
TLS Support Mail servers support TLS encryption โ†’ MTA-STS Policy MTA-STS not configured
โš ๏ธ MTA-STS policy is missing. Even with TLS support, you lack the enforcement layer that prevents attackers from stripping encryption (downgrade attacks).
Brand Identity Chain
BIMI displays your logo in email clients, but requires DMARC enforcement
DMARC Enforcement DMARC policy: reject โ†’ BIMI Record Brand logo configured
TLS Monitoring Chain
TLS-RPT provides reports about TLS connection failures
TLS Support Mail servers support TLS encryption โ†’ TLS-RPT Reporting TLS-RPT not configured
โš ๏ธ TLS-RPT is not configured. Without TLS reporting, you have no visibility into TLS connection failures that may be impacting email delivery.

Security Checks

MX Records
โœ“
SPF Record
โœ“
DKIM Record
โœ—
DMARC Policy
โœ“
BIMI Record
โœ“
CAA Records
โœ—
DNSSEC
โœ—
MTA-STS
โœ—
TLS-RPT
โœ—

Embed Badge

Display your domain's security grade on your website or README:

vanta.com Email Security Grade
<img src="https://scan.ractermx.com/badge/vanta.com.svg" alt="Email Security Grade">

Want to re-scan this domain for updated results?

Scan vanta.com Again